Monthly Archives: February 2014

Quote

Posted on by
Reply

And rather than shying away from technology because of the role it played in creating today’s problems—for example, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, made from petroleum, fueled the explosive growth in the production of grains, soybeans, and corn, which in turn were used to make the processed foods that make up so much of the American diet—these new food reformers seek to use it strategically to produce what we want without costs to our environment and our health. That requires more complexity than a network of community gardens can provide.

“SILICON VALLEY’S NEXT BIG GOAL: FIXING OUR BROKEN FOOD SYSTEM” via FastCompany

Amy and I try to eat ‘smart’: know where our food comes from, try to stay away from processed goods and ingredients, and keep our meals as “primitive” as possible, though I firmly believe that cavemen had a way to make single-malt scotch. We believe in and support local, sustainable farms, and our family’s butcher shop sources from several local farms and producers. 

Yet individual choices will likely never cause change on a massive scale, and I like this article’s perspective on the enormity of the problem. Yes, if we had to design the food system from scratch right now we’d likely do things very differently. Yes, folks like Amy and I try to do what we can to improve our own personal food system, and encourage friends and family to do the same. But the scale of change necessary to impact the nation (or world) is going to require recognition that our existing system is here to stay; that is, the needs of its users to have cheap, readily-available food will only grow and we can’t ignore it.

I’m excited to see what type of change tech+food companies can affect at scale.

Link

LinkedIn engagement is rising, and its high-income audience is especially desirable for brands.

A good summary of how well LinkedIn is doing, but the article also includes some good tips on “key times to post” on the various networks. We’re working hard on our social media presence for Contactive and are always testing to find the best time to post, blog, tweet, and share.

LinkedIn May Not Be The Coolest Social Network, But It’s Only Becoming More Valuable To Businesses

What’s the most random task you had to do in your last job?

Posted on by
Reply

Found this great article today that is perfectly timed given how we’re interviewing right now (and kind-of always are):

“Conduct the Perfect Job Interview in Twelve Simple Steps” via Jeff Haden on LinkedIn.

Contactive is always looking for great people. I find that the way I interview here in our 10-person startup is not too dissimilar from the way I interviewed at Microsoft. I continue to focus on assessing a candidate’s personality, their passion, and their skills (in roughly that order), using mostly experiential questions like “Talk to me about a time on in your old position where you had to talk someone down from a bad decision.”

Given the odd jobs that you sometimes have to do in a smaller company like ours, I’ve added a new one which is “Tell me about the most random task you had to do in your previous job that wasn’t in your actual job description.” I like to see how weird their “odd job” was to get a sense for their tolerances for doing random stuff. It may not be a perfect question, but I’ve heard some pretty interesting responses because of it.

Quote

Posted on by
Reply

By analyzing the behavior patterns of its digital and mobile users in 3 million locations worldwide—along with the unique climate data in each locale—the Weather Company has become an advertising powerhouse, letting shampoo brands, for example, target users in a humid climate with a new antifrizz product.

“THE WORLD’S TOP 10 MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES IN BIG DATA” via FastCompany

I traded off the Weather Company’s mobile app a while back and sort-of forgot about them. It’s incredible to see how big they’ve become and what they’re doing with the piles of mobile data they’re getting from their millions of users.

Link

bricin:

parislemon:

Apple CEO Tim Cook, talking to Daisuke Wakabayashi:

Last year, we grew (revenue) by $14 billion to $15 billion. Yes, those percentages are smaller compared to a year earlier and two years earlier and so forth. But that doesn’t mean that you’re not a growth company. We were in hyper-growth, or whatever is above growth. We went from $65 billion to over $100 billion to $150 billion to $170 billion. These are historic, unprecedented numbers. I don’t know any companies adding growth at that level. So when you say $14 billion to $15 billion compared to those numbers, it’s clearly smaller and a smaller percentage, but, to put it in some context, that’s like adding three Fortune 500 companies in a year. I think that’s hard to say that’s not a growth company.

This is another way to articulate the Law of Large Numbers issue that Apple faces. And it’s certainly hard to argue with.

Steve Ballmer said the same thing for years, no one believed him. Will they believe Tim Cook? And does it matter as long as the solutions continue to flow.

“That’s like adding three Fortune 500 companies in a year.”

Quote

Posted on by
Reply

Millennials don’t want to talk on the phone. It’s 2014. They don’t want to say, ‘Hi, my name is so-and-so,—’ and talk for 30 seconds before asking the real question. It’s too much overhead. They want to be able to go on a site and type very quickly, ‘Hi, I’m John Doe, what’s my order status?’ and boom, there’s the answer,

via Brian Park, “Goodbye Call Centers, Hello Cloud”

Quote

Posted on by
Reply

Considering that Twitter, as a much bigger company with 241 million monthly active users, just revealed that it generated $242.7 million in revenue for the fourth quarter, Line’s financial figures are pretty impressive.

“Line shows the potential for chat apps as platforms, after chalking up $338m in revenue for 2013” via TheNextWeb

It’s all about the stickers. 

“Through efforts such as the release of stickers featuring popular soccer stars in Mexico and the cultural highlights of Diwali, a major festival in India, the stickers business concentrated on producing highly localized products and was successful in further entrenching the culture of sticker communication in markets across the world.”

Link

parislemon:

The honeymoon is on. Microsoft finally announced a new CEO yesterday: Satya Nadella. And the blogosphere seemingly could not be more pleased.

And I have to admit, reading all the coverage, Nadella sounds like the right choice. He knows Microsoft. He was leading the one…

This is basically exactly how I feel (minus the fact that I still use a lot of MS services and devices):

“Look, I’m rooting for Microsoft. I know that given the devices I prefer and where I work, this will sound disingenuous. But I mean it. Microsoft was once the tech company I admired above all others. And if nothing else, I firmly believe that a strong Microsoft only helps push the entire ecosystem forward, faster. Competition is not only good, it’s vital. And no company will be more competitive than a strong Microsoft. Any way you slice it, that would be a huge win for us, the consumers.”

The Abbreviated Honeymoon Of The New Microsoft CEO